Mental health policy analysis of pfeiffer

Criminal Justice and Mental Health What We're Doing Now MHA works to move forward these ideas through activities that include federal and state legislative and regulatory reform, building public understanding of the issues, weighing in on key court cases, and collaboration with other advocates and coalitions to improve our system. MHA collaborates with leaders in the mental health and policy fields to design policy recommendations that promote:

Mental health policy analysis of pfeiffer

Vol 18 2 Abstract Objective: While there has been much research on predictors of psychiatric hospitalizations there has been little research on the community resources, supports and processes used to divert a hospital episode.

The purpose of this study is to address this gap by studying 1 the community resources available as an alternative to state psychiatric hospitalization; and 2 the practices exhibited when determining whether state hospitalization is necessary.

Mental health policy analysis of pfeiffer

A mixed methods design was developed. The purpose of the first arm was to assess what non-hospital resources were available to mental health centers. The second arm looked at the processes center staff goes through in determining hospitalization or community diversion.

Differences were noted between centers with high and those with low diversion rates. Centers that tended to use the state hospital less had more community diversion resources available, had an agency philosophy aimed at diversion, and used processes which included shared decision-making.

Further, staff had more experience and established protocols to ensure follow-up services were in place.

Mental health policy analysis of pfeiffer

Agencies that fostered a philosophy and protocol focusing on community diversion, provided alternative resources for consumers in crisis, and had adequate monitoring and training increased diversion rates and avoided unnecessary hospitalizations.

Introduction Three decades of deinstitutionalized driven initiatives and policies undertaken between and drastically reduced state psychiatric admissions in the U.


Further augmentation of this trend for moderating state psychiatric hospitalization admissions remains a significant goal of public mental health services today. However, state psychiatric hospital admissions rose by Given that data, a large percentage of persons being admitted to state psychiatric hospitals are under no legal mandate to be admitted.

In line with public policy, there has been a wealth of studies on predictors of hospitalization for individuals with psychiatric disabilities e. While there has been much research on predictors of hospitalization there has been little research on the processes and actions taken by the screener or resources available to those who are charged with making the hospitalization decision.

WHO | How should ethics be incorporated into public health policy and practice?

This is surprising given that screeners are the gatekeepers to and at the nexus of the hospitalization process. In virtually all states, the decision to hospitalize a person is made by a single person or, in some systems, by a group of clinicians.

If the person agrees and there is a bed available, an admission occurs. In the case where a person refuses to enter the hospital, the case is referred to the court for disposition.


In either case, a clinical decision was made. Since there are dramatically fewer state hospital beds than in years past, a decision to hospitalize anyone inevitably jeopardizes access to this service to someone who may require it.

Despite the importance of this decision, there has not been research that sought to uncover the decision-making process and influences on the people who are called on to make these important decisions. To begin to address this gap, this qualitative study sought to identify the factors that influenced the decision to hospitalize or not.Literature on HEAL Trafficking: Health, Education, Advocacy, Linkage | Literature on the health care needs of trafficking victims Literature on the health care needs of trafficking victims, tools for identifying trafficked persons, and the role of physicians in fighting trafficking continues to grow.

Focuses his current work on the knowledge translation activities of the Temple University Collaborative, including delivery of training, technical assistance, and consultation services to provider agencies, consumer groups, advocacy associations, and county and state mental health authorities.

Ms. Meryl Pfeiffer is a Counselor - Mental Health based out of Summit, New Jersey and her medical specialization is Counselor - Mental practices in Summit, New Jersey and has the professional credentials of LPC (Licensed Professional Counselor).The NPI Number for Ms.

Meryl Pfeiffer is and she holds a Licence No. 37PC (New Jersey).

Search form

Midterm exam, Health economics, Spring Answer key Instructions: All points on true/false and multiple choice questions will be given for the expla- nation. Note that you can choose which questions to answer in the short answer and long answer.

Health Policy Report Medicare Advantage Checkup Original Article A Controlled Trial of Selegiline, Alpha-Tocopherol, or Both as Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease. Mental health represents a critical indicator of human development, serves as a key determinant of well-being, quality of life, and hope, has an impact on a range of development outcomes, and is .

Ms. Meryl Pfeiffer, Counselor - Mental Health in Summit - NPI , Contact and Address